October 30, 2009

You are currently browsing the daily archive for October 30, 2009.

Breech births are difficult.  Instead of the baby’s head at the bottom, ready to charge through at the proper time, it is the feet which are “presented” to the doctor.  A viewing of the movie “Red Cliff” showed Zhuge Liang (played by Takeshi Kaneshiro) successfully solve the problem of breech birth in a horse.  However, traditionally the use of moxibustion on acupoint Zhiyin (BL-67, or the 67th point of the Bladder channel).  However, a recent article <http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE59S41C20091029?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=10522> says that the “Chinese Medicine Tactic doesn’t turn breech babies”

Before I examine the article in depth, I’d like to point out how this “tactic” is supposed to work.

Using a Moxibustion "cigar"

Using a Moxibustion "cigar"

Peter Deadman describes the procedure as such:

The principal application of Zhiyin BL-67 is the treatment of malposition of the foetus, for which it is renowned.  For this purpose it is treated by stick moxibustion for fifteen to twenty minutes bilaterally, or by moxa cones (five to ten cones at each point) once or twice a day.  the woman should loosen her clothes and sit in a comfortable semi-reclining position.  It is common practice in China to demonstrate this method to the pregnant woman who is then supplied with moxa sticks for self-treatment at home.  Best results are achieved if this treatment is started in the 34th week.

That’s what Peter Deadman says in his encyclopedic work, A Manual of Acupuncture which is actually more huge textbook than manual.  Other texts describe the procedure differently:

Chinese Therapeutic Methods of Acupoints published by Hunan Science and Technology Press elaborates:

Let the patient loosen her clothing and evacuate the urine from her bladder.  She should lie supine in bed.  then, hold two moxa sticks respectively 2-3 cm bilaterally to Zhiyin (BL-47).  Ignite them for moxibustion for 15-20 minutes causing local congestion.  The treatment is given once a day.

What strikes me in this description is the need to perform moxibustion on both sides (two points, both BL-67) simultaneously.

So how did the study do it?  You know the drill by know, folks: we quote the study and critique it.

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – A traditional Chinese therapy used for turning babies out of the breech position before birth may not be effective, a new study finds.

The study, reported in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, tested a tactic known as moxibustion, which uses heat to stimulate a particular acupuncture point in an effort to turn a breech fetus to the head-down position before birth.

Moxibustion is MORE than just heat.  It is also exposing the acupoint to the essential oils released when the mugwort plant (mogusa in Japanese, hence the name “moxa”) is burned.

Some research has suggested moxibustion might be effective; a trial in China, for example, found that the method increased the chances of the fetus turning to the head-down position.

However, some other studies have been unable to replicate that success, and moxibustion remains “controversial” outside of Chinese medicine, according to the researchers on the new study, led by Marie-Julia Guittier of the Geneva University Hospitals in Switzerland.

Uh… I love it when people seem to imply that only Chinese studies prove efficacy.  What about the following:

Acupuncture plus moxibustion to resolve breech presentation: a randomized controlled study.  – Neri I – J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – 01-APR-2004; 15(4): 247-52

OBJECTIVE: In many Western countries breech presentation is an indication for elective Cesarean section. In order to correct fetal presentation, the stimulation of the acupoint BL67 by moxibustion, acupuncture or both has been proposed. Since no studies had previously been carried out on Western populations, pregnant Italian women at 33-35 weeks gestational age carrying a fetus in breech presentation were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial involving an active BL67 point stimulation and an observation group. METHODS: A total of 240 women at 33-35 weeks of gestation carrying a fetus in breech presentation were randomized to receive active treatment (acupuncture plus moxibustion) or to be assigned to the observation group. Bilateral acupuncture plus moxibustion was applied at the BL67 acupoint (Zhiyin). The primary outcome of the study was fetal presentation at delivery. RESULTS: Fourteen cases dropped out. The final analysis was thus made on 226 cases, 114 randomized to observation and 112 to acupuncture plus moxibustion. At delivery, the proportion of cephalic version was lower in the observation group (36.7%) than in the active-treatment group (53.6 %) (p = 0.01). Hence, the proportion of Cesarean sections indicated for breech presentation was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the observation group (52.3% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture plus moxibustion is more effective than observation in revolving fetuses in breech presentation. Such a method appears to be a valid option for women willing to experience a natural birth.

That was not just moxibustion however: it was acupuncture AND moxibustion.

Effectiveness of acupuncture-type interventions versus expectant management to correct breech presentation: A systematic review – van der Berg et al, Complementary Therapies in Medicine Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 92-100 Online March 18, 2008 Accessed 30 october 2009 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WCS-4S0356K-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=c619612fbda948f84d4d532350dfd306>

Objective

A systematic review of studies assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture-type interventions (moxibustion, acupuncture, or electro-acupuncture) on acupuncture point BL 67 to correct breech presentation compared to expectant management, based on controlled trials.

Data sources

Articles published from 1980 to May 2007 in databases of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, AMED, NCCAM, Midirs and reference lists.

Study selection

Studies included were original articles; randomised controlled trials (RCT) or controlled cohort studies; acupuncture-type intervention on BL 67 compared with expectant management; ultrasound confirmed breech presentation and position of the fetus after treatment confirmed with ultrasound, position at delivery, and/or the proportion of caesarean sections reported.

Data extraction

Three reviewers independently extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Data synthesis

Of 65 retrieved citations, six RCT’s and three cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using random-effects models. In the RCT’s the pooled proportion of breech presentations was 34% (95% CI: 20–49%) following treatment versus 66% (95% CI: 55–77%) in the control group (OR 0.25 95% CI: 0.11–0.58). The pooled proportion in the cohort studies was 15% (95% CI: 1–28%) versus 36% (95% CI: 14–58%), (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.19–0.43). Including all studies the pooled proportion was 28% (95% CI: 16–40%) versus 56% (95% CI: 43–70%) (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15–0.46).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that acupuncture-type interventions on BL 67 are effective in correcting breech presentation compared to expectant management. Some studies were of inferior quality to others and further RCT’s of improved quality are necessary to adequately answer the research question.

Breech Pregnancies - treated by moxibustion?

Breech Pregnancies - treated by moxibustion?

Habek D, Habek J and Jagust. “Acupuncture Conversion of Fetal Breech Presentation” Fetal Diagn Ther 2003;18:418-421 (DOI: 10.1159/000073135)  Accessed 30 October 2009<http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Doi=73135>

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the value of acupuncture (AP) in the conversion of fetal breech presentation into vertex presentation. Patients and Methods: A randomized prospective controlled clinical study included 67 pregnant women with fetal breech presentation: 34 women with singleton pregnancies treated with manual AP (urinary bladder 67, Zhiyin) and a control group which included 33 women with singleton pregnancies without AP treatment. The AP treatment lasted 30 min a day, and was conducted during and after 34 weeks of pregnancy with simultaneous cardiotocography. Results: The success rate of the AP correction of fetal breech presentation is 76.4% (26 women), and spontaneous conversion without AP in vertex presentation is observed in 15 women (45.4%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We believe that AP correction of fetal malpresentation is a relatively simple, efficacious and inexpensive method associated with a lower percentage of operatively completed deliveries, which definitely reflects in improved parameters of vital and perinatal statistics.

So… a study in Croatia suggests that not only is it effective, but that it improves fetal health as well.

But anyway back to our article of the day:

For their study, the researchers followed 212 women who had a fetus in the breech position between the 34th and 36th week of pregnancy.

Half of the women were randomly assigned to have moxibustion therapy; a midwife trained in acupuncture performed it three times weekly in the hospital, and the women were encouraged to do it at home on all other days. The rest of the women received no therapy and served as control group.

All study participants, however, had the option of undergoing an ECV at the 37th week of pregnancy.

In the end, Guittier’s team found, 18 percent of fetuses in the moxibustion group had turned to the head-down position by the time of delivery or a scheduled ECV. In the control group, 16 percent of fetuses had spontaneously turned — a difference that was not statistically significant.

I am very much looking forward to obtaining a copy of this study because I want to see the following answered:

a) what BRAND of moxibustion was used? (some brands are great, some suck big time… like comparing cheap china watches to rolexes)

b) how COMPLIANT were the mothers-to-be in terms of using the moxa at home?

c) what MANIPULATION was used? You don’t just wave the stick at the toe, there are various techniques to it.

Also, the study was done with MIDWIVES TRAINED IN ACUPUNCTURE.  Note, MIDWIVES TRAINED IN ACUPUNCTURE.  Not fully trained acupuncturists.  Maybe they think this is simple enough, waving weed on a toe.

“To say the least, moxibustion was not as effective as suggested in (the) earlier trial that was conducted in China,” co-researcher Dr. Michel Boulvain, also with the Geneva University Hospitals, told Reuters Health in an email. The reasons for the differences in the trials, he added, are unclear.

Yes, the study says it was not as effective as the earlier trial conducted in China AND the one in Italy AND the one in Croatia AND the one… etc.

It’s also unclear whether moxibustion has any physiological effects that would help turn a breech fetus.

Boulvain said that some researchers have reported increases in fetal movement during moxibustion sessions, which in theory could be beneficial. But he added that there are no known reasons, based on “traditional physiology,” for why moxibustion would work in this context.

Based on the existing evidence, Boulvain said, “the decision in our hospital is to not implement or recommend moxibustion for these women.

I agree, conventional physiology cannot explain acupuncture 100%, which is why I cringe when some MDs try to force acupuncture to fit into western concepts.  Acupuncture and Moxibustion developed using CHINESE philosophy, CHINESE experience and CHINESE vocabulary.

And he has the guts to say “based on the existing evidence…” Well based on YOUR evidence maybe, not based on the kaboodles of others, “…the decision in our hospital is not to implement or recommend moxibustion for these women.” I agree, especially if the treatment is not done by professionals.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , ,

Diane Harper is THE leading researcher in the development of cervical cancer “vaccines”.  In a recent conference she had this to say, and I quote from this article <http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt>

Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.

Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received.

I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.

So it boils down to risk assessment!

Dr. Harper began her remarks by explaining that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within two years, the number climbs to 90 percent. Of the remaining 10 percent of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical cancer, which leaves little need for the vaccine.

She went on to surprise the audience by stating that the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that “even if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.”

There will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70 percent of the population is vaccinated, and even then, the decrease will be minimal.

Those are very strong words, Diane!

Apparently, conventional treatment and preventative measures are already cutting the cervical cancer rate by four percent a year. At this rate, in 60 years, there will be a 91.4 percent decline just with current treatment. Even if 70 percent of women get the shot and required boosters over the same time period, which is highly unlikely, Harper says Gardasil still could not claim to do as much as traditional care is already doing.

Dr. Harper, who also serves as a consultant to the World Health Organization, further undercut the case for mass vaccination by saying that “four out of five women with cervical cancer are in developing countries.”

Would that mean that an increase in hygenic practices and/or better diet would be better than an untested vaccine?  Also, even in developing countries, only those who live in first world conditions can afford the expensive vaccine… so what’s the point?

Dr. Diane Harper

Dr. Diane Harper

Ms. Robinson said she could not help but wonder, “If this is the case, then why vaccinate at all? But from the murmurs of the doctors in the audience, it was apparent that the same thought was occurring to them.”

However, at this point, Dr. Harper dropped an even bigger bombshell on the audience when she announced that, “There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years.”

Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, studied only a small group of girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies.

This is not the first time Dr. Harper revealed the fact that Merck never tested Gardasil for safety in young girls. During a 2007 interview with KPC News.com, she said giving the vaccine to girls as young as 11 years-old “is a great big public health experiment.”

At the time, which was at the height of Merck’s controversial drive to have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to convince major television and print media about her concerns, “but no one will print it.”

“It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls,” she said at the time. “There also is not enough evidence gathered on side effects to know that safety is not an issue.”

When asked why she was speaking out, she said: “I want to be able to sleep with myself when I go to bed at night.”

Since the drug’s introduction in 2006, the public has been learning many of these facts the hard way. To date, 15,037 girls have officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse reactions include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there have been 44 reported deaths.

Hmmm, in my very first blog article (http://qi-spot.com/2009/10/03/british-girl-dies-after-cervical-cancer-jab/) it was said that there were 32 deaths.  Now there are 44?


Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.

The outspoken researcher also weighed in last month on a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that raised questions about the safety of the vaccine, saying bluntly: “The rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.”

Ms. Robinson said she respects Dr. Harper’s candor. “I think she’s a scientist, a researcher, and she’s genuine enough a scientist to be open about the risks. I respect that in her.”

However, she failed to make the case for Gardasil. “For me, it was hard to resist the conclusion that Gardasil does almost nothing for the health of American women.”

Again, nothing that we Chinese docs don’t already know – taking care of your own health is priority! Vaccines can work and I would recommend them if properly tested and not politically or profit motivated.

Dr. Harper’s photo from colleenhammond.com.

Source Article:

Brinkman, Susan.  “Gardasil Researcher Drops a Bombshell” The Bulletin.  25 October 2009.  Retrieved 31 October 2009. <http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt>

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,

Switch to our mobile site